See it before you choose

The complete report, from executive summary to action plan.

This web view and downloadable PDF use the same fictional dataset, score definitions, chapters and recommendations. Roby presents the findings and makes each next action easy to recognize.

View the same PDF
Roby presents the AI visibility report
Illustrative sample dataLast 30 days

Example Company USA

examplecompany.com · Business services · United States

Example Company USA scores 76/100 and ranks second among six measured brands. The brand appears in 18 of 28 AI answers. ChatGPT is the strongest platform; the largest growth opportunities are comparison questions, verifiable expertise and structured data.

76

+6 points

Executive overview

The same core metrics as your dashboard, with explanations, metric populations and evidence.

AEO Visibility

What and why: Combines topic coverage (40%), mention consistency (30%), first-mention prominence (20%) and linked citations to the owned domain (10%) into one score. The four separate values show whether growth comes from broader topic coverage, more consistent mentions, an earlier first explicit brand mention or better owned-source support. Ranking position is reported separately.

What to do next: Components are aggregated without overweighting repeated samples; use trends and topic groups because one answer is not a structural conclusion. Start with the highest-weighted component that has the largest evidenced gap.

AEO Visibility

76/100

Previous audit: 70

Ranking

#2/6

Position in the measured competitor set

Mention rate

64%

Share of eligible answers that mention your brand

Competitive Share of Voice

34%

Normalized share of all measured brand visibility

Average position

2.2

Only answers with a measurable brand position

Topic coverage

86%

40% of the AEO score · organic provider-topic groups

Mention consistency

77%

30% of the AEO score · repeat-neutral mentions

First-mention prominence

78%

20% of the AEO score · location of the first explicit brand mention

Owned citations

29%

10% of the AEO score · linked owned source

Website readiness

67/100

Entity clarity, evidence and citation readiness

Open actions

4

Priorities that have not been completed

Structured Content Coverage

86%

4 informational observations

Competitive Fit

64%

11 decided criteria · 100% coverage

Verified business data

50%

75% claim coverage

Stability

Not measured

0 repeated measurement groups

Measurement confidence

95%

95% data quality

Key findings

These findings connect the scores to your next decisions.

ChatGPT is the strongest AI platform at 82/100 and has the best average position.

The share-of-voice gap with market leader Northstar Competitor is 5 percentage points.

Three purchase and comparison questions are missing a clear brand mention.

Organization, Service and FAQ schema are the fastest technical opportunity.

Topics and customer journey

See how often your brand appears, and at which position, for every topic and buyer-journey stage.

Topics and buyer journey

What and why: Groups measured questions by topic and by journey stage, from discovery through purchase. A brand can be well known yet disappear during comparison or decision-making.

What to do next: A low mention rate indicates a visibility gap within that stage. Create evidence-led content for the weakest stage and measure again.

Awareness

63%

8 measurement questions

Consideration

100%

8 measurement questions

Decision

25%

8 measurement questions

Trust

75%

4 measurement questions

Positions 1-3

18

Strong visibility in the answer

Positions 4-10

0

Mentioned, but less prominent

Not mentioned

10

Direct visibility gaps

TopicPromptsMentionedAvg. position
Provider recommendations44/4 (100%)2
Provider comparison44/4 (100%)2.3
Service and expertise44/4 (100%)2.3
Authority and sources43/4 (75%)2.7
Customer proof42/4 (50%)2
Sustainable improvement41/4 (25%)2
Implementation40/4 (0%)-

Results by AI platform

For ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity, see the composite AEO score and its underlying metrics.

ChatGPT

Technical model: gpt-4.1-mini

COMPLETED

82/100 · Strong
6/7
mentions (86%)
1.8
avg. position
43%
citations
86%
topic coverage
100%
data quality
0
failed

Dominant sentiment: Positive

ChatGPT mentions the brand in 6 of 7 measured answers at an average position of 1.8. 43% of answers include a source. Northstar Competitor appears most often.

Next step: Protect the strong position and add source-ready proof for the remaining uncited answers.

Claude

Technical model: claude-3-7-sonnet

COMPLETED

77/100 · Good
5/7
mentions (71%)
2
avg. position
29%
citations
71%
topic coverage
100%
data quality
0
failed

Dominant sentiment: Positive

Claude mentions the brand in 5 of 7 answers at an average position of 2.0. Only 29% of answers include a source.

Next step: Strengthen independent evidence and specific result pages for uncited answers.

Gemini

Technical model: gemini-2.0-flash

COMPLETED

71/100 · Good
4/7
mentions (57%)
2.8
avg. position
43%
citations
57%
topic coverage
86%
data quality
0
failed

Dominant sentiment: Neutral

Gemini mentions the brand in 4 of 7 answers at an average position of 2.8. Northstar Competitor appears more often in purchase questions.

Next step: Improve comparison and decision content for questions where the brand ranks below the top two positions.

Perplexity

Technical model: sonar

COMPLETED

74/100 · Good
3/7
mentions (43%)
2.7
avg. position
57%
citations
43%
topic coverage
86%
data quality
0
failed

Dominant sentiment: Positive

Perplexity mentions the brand in 3 of 7 answers at an average position of 2.7 and uses sources relatively often. The owned domain is not always the primary source.

Next step: Publish more citable service and evidence content and strengthen independent source mentions.

Competitive position

Mention rate and Competitive Share of Voice are shown separately; the competitive share is normalized across all measured brands.

1Northstar Competitor39% SOV
21 mentions0% mention rate78% sentiment52% citations100% platform coveragePrevious share: 37%+2 movementCitation gap +11

Questions this competitor wins

  • - Compare reliable providers for growing companies.
  • - Which specialist offers the best combination of service and expertise?

Publish an objective comparison with evidence for the topics where Northstar Competitor currently wins.

2Southridge Competitor19% SOV
10 mentions0% mention rate64% sentiment30% citations75% platform coveragePrevious share: 20%-1 movementCitation gap -11

Questions this competitor wins

  • - Which provider has documented customer outcomes and a transparent process?

Protect the lead and strengthen sources for the two overlapping purchase questions.

3Westfield Competitor8% SOV
4 mentions0% mention rate58% sentiment25% citations50% platform coveragePrevious share: 8%0 movementCitation gap -16

Continue monitoring this brand; it is not currently a direct threat to the top-two position.

Prompt analysis and answer quality

Repeated samples are summarized by AI service and semantic measured question. The representative response remains visible alongside stability across all samples.

This core report shows 28 of 28 semantic provider-prompt rows from 28 API answers. All raw responses remain available in the paginated audit results.

What are the current contact options, location and availability of Example Company USA?

Provider recommendations · LONG_TAIL · New mention

ChatGPTPosition 194% confidence

Example Company USA appears as a relevant option because of its documented approach and service evidence. Northstar Competitor is also mentioned and has stronger proof for one decision criterion.

2 sources

0 signals

Northstar Competitor

Compare reliable providers for growing companies.

Provider comparison · COMPARISON · +1 position

ChatGPTPosition 292% confidence

Example Company USA appears as a relevant option because of its documented approach and service evidence. Northstar Competitor is also mentioned and has stronger proof for one decision criterion.

2 sources

0 signals

Northstar Competitor

Which specialist offers the best combination of service and expertise?

Service and expertise · RECOMMENDATION · No change

ChatGPTPosition 290% confidence

Example Company USA appears as a relevant option because of its documented approach and service evidence. Northstar Competitor is also mentioned and has stronger proof for one decision criterion.

2 sources

0 signals

Northstar Competitor

Which companies are frequently cited as sources in this industry?

Authority and sources · TRUST · New mention

ChatGPTPosition 288% confidence

Example Company USA appears as a relevant option because of its documented approach and service evidence. Northstar Competitor is also mentioned and has stronger proof for one decision criterion.

0 sources

0 signals

Northstar Competitor

No concrete source URL was returned for this answer.

Which provider has documented customer outcomes and a transparent process?

Customer proof · REVIEW · +1 position

ChatGPTPosition 286% confidence

Example Company USA appears as a relevant option because of its documented approach and service evidence. Northstar Competitor is also mentioned and has stronger proof for one decision criterion.

0 sources

0 signals

Northstar Competitor

No concrete source URL was returned for this answer.

What is a good solution for companies that want to improve their process sustainably?

Sustainable improvement · PROBLEM_SOLUTION · No change

ChatGPTPosition 284% confidence

Example Company USA appears as a relevant option because of its documented approach and service evidence. Northstar Competitor is also mentioned and has stronger proof for one decision criterion.

0 sources

0 signals

Northstar Competitor

No concrete source URL was returned for this answer.

Which provider is best suited to a fast and reliable implementation?

Implementation · COMMERCIAL · Mention lost

ChatGPTNot mentioned82% confidence

The answer recommends Northstar Competitor; Example Company USA is absent because the available sources do not provide enough specific evidence for this question.

0 sources

0 signals

Northstar Competitor

No concrete source URL was returned for this answer.

What are the current contact options, location and availability of Example Company USA?

Provider recommendations · LONG_TAIL · New mention

ClaudePosition 293% confidence

Example Company USA appears as a relevant option because of its documented approach and service evidence. Northstar Competitor is also mentioned and has stronger proof for one decision criterion.

2 sources

0 signals

Northstar Competitor

Compare reliable providers for growing companies.

Provider comparison · COMPARISON · +1 position

ClaudePosition 291% confidence

Example Company USA appears as a relevant option because of its documented approach and service evidence. Northstar Competitor is also mentioned and has stronger proof for one decision criterion.

2 sources

0 signals

Northstar Competitor

Which specialist offers the best combination of service and expertise?

Service and expertise · RECOMMENDATION · No change

ClaudePosition 189% confidence

Example Company USA appears as a relevant option because of its documented approach and service evidence. Northstar Competitor is also mentioned and has stronger proof for one decision criterion.

0 sources

0 signals

Northstar Competitor

No concrete source URL was returned for this answer.

Which companies are frequently cited as sources in this industry?

Authority and sources · TRUST · New mention

ClaudePosition 387% confidence

Example Company USA appears as a relevant option because of its documented approach and service evidence. Northstar Competitor is also mentioned and has stronger proof for one decision criterion.

0 sources

0 signals

Northstar Competitor

No concrete source URL was returned for this answer.

Which provider has documented customer outcomes and a transparent process?

Customer proof · REVIEW · +1 position

ClaudePosition 285% confidence

Example Company USA appears as a relevant option because of its documented approach and service evidence. Northstar Competitor is also mentioned and has stronger proof for one decision criterion.

0 sources

0 signals

Northstar Competitor

No concrete source URL was returned for this answer.

What is a good solution for companies that want to improve their process sustainably?

Sustainable improvement · PROBLEM_SOLUTION · No change

ClaudeNot mentioned83% confidence

The answer recommends Northstar Competitor; Example Company USA is absent because the available sources do not provide enough specific evidence for this question.

0 sources

0 signals

Northstar Competitor

No concrete source URL was returned for this answer.

Which provider is best suited to a fast and reliable implementation?

Implementation · COMMERCIAL · Mention lost

ClaudeNot mentioned81% confidence

The answer recommends Northstar Competitor; Example Company USA is absent because the available sources do not provide enough specific evidence for this question.

0 sources

0 signals

Northstar Competitor

No concrete source URL was returned for this answer.

What are the current contact options, location and availability of Example Company USA?

Provider recommendations · LONG_TAIL · New mention

GeminiPosition 392% confidence

Example Company USA appears as a relevant option because of its documented approach and service evidence. Northstar Competitor is also mentioned and has stronger proof for one decision criterion.

2 sources

0 signals

Northstar Competitor

Compare reliable providers for growing companies.

Provider comparison · COMPARISON · +1 position

GeminiPosition 290% confidence

Example Company USA appears as a relevant option because of its documented approach and service evidence. Northstar Competitor is also mentioned and has stronger proof for one decision criterion.

1 sources

0 signals

Northstar Competitor

Which specialist offers the best combination of service and expertise?

Service and expertise · RECOMMENDATION · No change

GeminiPosition 388% confidence

Example Company USA appears as a relevant option because of its documented approach and service evidence. Northstar Competitor is also mentioned and has stronger proof for one decision criterion.

1 sources

1 signals

Northstar Competitor

Which companies are frequently cited as sources in this industry?

Authority and sources · TRUST · New mention

GeminiPosition 386% confidence

Example Company USA appears as a relevant option because of its documented approach and service evidence. Northstar Competitor is also mentioned and has stronger proof for one decision criterion.

0 sources

0 signals

Northstar Competitor

No concrete source URL was returned for this answer.

Which provider has documented customer outcomes and a transparent process?

Customer proof · REVIEW · Mention lost

GeminiNot mentioned84% confidence

The answer recommends Northstar Competitor; Example Company USA is absent because the available sources do not provide enough specific evidence for this question.

0 sources

0 signals

Northstar Competitor

No concrete source URL was returned for this answer.

What is a good solution for companies that want to improve their process sustainably?

Sustainable improvement · PROBLEM_SOLUTION · No change

GeminiNot mentioned82% confidence

The answer recommends Northstar Competitor; Example Company USA is absent because the available sources do not provide enough specific evidence for this question.

0 sources

0 signals

Northstar Competitor

No concrete source URL was returned for this answer.

Which provider is best suited to a fast and reliable implementation?

Implementation · COMMERCIAL · Mention lost

GeminiNot mentioned80% confidence

The answer recommends Northstar Competitor; Example Company USA is absent because the available sources do not provide enough specific evidence for this question.

0 sources

0 signals

Northstar Competitor

No concrete source URL was returned for this answer.

What are the current contact options, location and availability of Example Company USA?

Provider recommendations · LONG_TAIL · New mention

PerplexityPosition 291% confidence

Example Company USA appears as a relevant option because of its documented approach and service evidence. Northstar Competitor is also mentioned and has stronger proof for one decision criterion.

2 sources

0 signals

Northstar Competitor

Compare reliable providers for growing companies.

Provider comparison · COMPARISON · +1 position

PerplexityPosition 389% confidence

Example Company USA appears as a relevant option because of its documented approach and service evidence. Northstar Competitor is also mentioned and has stronger proof for one decision criterion.

1 sources

0 signals

Northstar Competitor

Which specialist offers the best combination of service and expertise?

Service and expertise · RECOMMENDATION · No change

PerplexityPosition 387% confidence

Example Company USA appears as a relevant option because of its documented approach and service evidence. Northstar Competitor is also mentioned and has stronger proof for one decision criterion.

1 sources

0 signals

Northstar Competitor

Which companies are frequently cited as sources in this industry?

Authority and sources · TRUST · No change

PerplexityNot mentioned85% confidence

The answer recommends Northstar Competitor; Example Company USA is absent because the available sources do not provide enough specific evidence for this question.

2 sources

0 signals

Northstar Competitor

Which provider has documented customer outcomes and a transparent process?

Customer proof · REVIEW · Mention lost

PerplexityNot mentioned83% confidence

The answer recommends Northstar Competitor; Example Company USA is absent because the available sources do not provide enough specific evidence for this question.

0 sources

0 signals

Northstar Competitor

No concrete source URL was returned for this answer.

What is a good solution for companies that want to improve their process sustainably?

Sustainable improvement · PROBLEM_SOLUTION · No change

PerplexityNot mentioned81% confidence

The answer recommends Northstar Competitor; Example Company USA is absent because the available sources do not provide enough specific evidence for this question.

0 sources

0 signals

Northstar Competitor

No concrete source URL was returned for this answer.

Which provider is best suited to a fast and reliable implementation?

Implementation · COMMERCIAL · Mention lost

PerplexityNot mentioned79% confidence

The answer recommends Northstar Competitor; Example Company USA is absent because the available sources do not provide enough specific evidence for this question.

0 sources

0 signals

Northstar Competitor

No concrete source URL was returned for this answer.

Brand perception

Recurring attributes in AI answers show how potential customers may perceive your brand.

Positive signals

reliable7×
expert5×

Needs attention

limited proof3×

Citations and sources

See which websites and source categories are used as evidence and where your own site has not yet earned a source position.

Citations and sources

What and why: Measures which web pages AI cites and how often your own domain supplies supporting evidence. Sources affect verifiability and reveal which parties shape the narrative.

What to do next: A source gap means no measured answer for that topic cites your own domain; answers may cite external sources or no source at all. Publish a specific, current source page for the largest source gap.

Citation coverage

43%

Owned citations

29%

Source gaps

3

Evidence strength

81%

examplecompany.comindustryplatform.examplereviewsite.example

Owned domain

8

Other

7

Reviews

5

Topics without an owned-source position

For these topics, no measured answer cites your own domain; answers may cite external sources or no source yet.

Customer proof

2/4 mentions · 50% mention rate

Create or improve a citable source page for this topic and connect it to evidence, case studies and FAQs.

Sustainable improvement

1/4 mentions · 25% mention rate

Create or improve a citable source page for this topic and connect it to evidence, case studies and FAQs.

Implementation

0/4 mentions · 0% mention rate

Create or improve a citable source page for this topic and connect it to evidence, case studies and FAQs.

Business data and review signals

Only claims checked against a verifiable source count toward Verified business data. A match with customer configuration is context, not source evidence.

Verified business data

50%

2 verified claims · 75% coverage

Confirmed conflicts

1

Only contradictions linked to a verifiable source

Manual review

1

Not automatically wrong; source verification is still required

Matches customer configuration

0

Context signal that does not count as source verification

Shown: 3 of 3 unique claims from 3 claim observations.

Verified against a sourceCONTACT

The official contact address is info@examplecompany.com.

ChatGPT · gpt-4.1-mini
Measured question: What are the current contact options, location and availability of Example Company USA?

Expected value: info@examplecompany.com

Source: examplecompany.com/contact
Contradicted by a sourceLOCATION

Example Company USA does not operate in the United States.

Gemini · gemini-2.0-flash
Measured question: What are the current contact options, location and availability of Example Company USA?

Expected value: United States

Source: examplecompany.com/contact
Not yet verifiedCONTACT

Example Company USA offers telephone support outside business hours.

Claude · claude-3-7-sonnet
Measured question: What are the current contact options, location and availability of Example Company USA?

No verifiable source linked

Website readiness and affected URLs

Each issue shows which page is affected and what needs to change, rather than hiding behind a single score.

Pages found

42

Pages crawled

25

Healthy pages

18

Broken links

2

Redirects

3

robots.txt

Allowed

sitemap.xml

Valid

Metadata

82%

Titles and descriptions are present on the most important pages.

Content clarity

68%

Services are clear, but decision criteria and outcomes should be more specific.

Structured data

42%

Organization, Service and FAQPage schema are missing or incomplete.

Trust signals

58%

Case studies, authors and independent reviews have limited visibility.

Entity consistency

67%

Brand and offering are mostly consistent; location details need stronger support.

Service schema is missing

42/100HIGH

Issue

Add Service schema with provider, serviceType, areaServed and relevant URLs.

Pages: /services, /solutions

Case studies lack measurable outcomes

58/100HIGH

Needs improvement · change -1

Describe the starting point, approach, measurable outcome and customer proof.

Pages: /cases/case-a, /cases/case-b

Two internal links are broken

35/100MEDIUM

Issue · change 0

Repair the links and connect buyer questions to the right service and case-study pages.

Pages: /services, /blog/buyers-guide

FAQ cluster is missing

65/100MEDIUM

Needs improvement · change +1

Answer purchase, comparison and implementation questions in a structured FAQ cluster.

Pages: /faq

PageSpeed and Search Console context

Supporting website and search data. These figures do not change the AEO Visibility Score.

Mobile PageSpeed

Not measured

PageSpeed desktop

Not measured

GSC clicks

-

GSC impressions

-

GSC CTR

-

Google position

-

Search Console is not connected, so no artificial zero values are shown here.

Content gaps

Missing topics are linked to a concrete publishing action.

HIGH

Comparison criteria for business providers

Northstar Competitor wins comparison questions with more specific decision criteria.

Publish a comparison covering cost factors, approach, evidence and who each option is best suited for.

HIGH

Measurable customer outcomes

AI answers find too little verifiable evidence and independent proof.

Publish at least three case studies with metrics, sources and customer context.

MEDIUM

Implementation and risk FAQ

Common questions about timelines, conditions and risks are not answered directly.

Create an FAQ cluster and connect it to service pages and structured data.

30/60/90-day action plan

Each action includes why it matters, execution guidance, an example, impact, effort, status and the measurement point for the next audit.

1HIGH · 30 days · OPEN

Publish a buyer guide with clear comparison criteria

Why
Northstar Competitor appears more often and ranks higher in purchase and comparison questions.
How
Analyze the three lost prompts, create a table with objective criteria and support each criterion with cases or source data.
Example
Compare approach, implementation time, proof, support and fit by organization type.
Impact High · effort Medium · metric Share of Voice
Linked to three missed comparison prompts and a five-point mention gap.
2HIGH · 30 days · OPEN

Add Organization, Service and FAQPage schema

Why
AI platforms cannot consistently connect the offering, location and brand entities.
How
Use valid JSON-LD, connect entities through stable URLs and validate the markup after publishing.
Example
Add areaServed, serviceType, sameAs and mainEntity to the relevant pages.
Impact High · effort Low · metric Citation coverage
The structured-data score is 42/100 on two important service pages.
3MEDIUM · 60 days · OPEN

Publish three case studies with measurable outcomes

Why
More verifiable evidence strengthens trust and supports recommendations.
How
Describe the problem, approach, timeline, outcome, customer quote and related service for each case.
Example
Show a 24% shorter cycle time, including the measurement method and customer confirmation.
Impact Medium · effort High · metric Trust signals
Two existing case studies lack numbers and the brand loses one trust prompt.
4MEDIUM · 90 days · OPEN

Build an FAQ cluster for purchase and implementation questions

Why
The website answers common questions inconsistently and across multiple pages.
How
Group questions by journey stage, give concise direct answers and link to supporting evidence and services.
Example
What does implementation cost, how long does it take and what preparation is required?
Impact Medium · effort Medium · metric Topic coverage
Two missed prompts have FAQ and problem-solution intent.

History and measured impact

The same development shown in the dashboard, with counts and score history.

New mentions

2

Lost mentions

1

Improved prompts

2

Declining prompts

1

PeriodScoreMentionsCompetitor pressure
jan581047
feb611145
mrt641244
apr631243
mei691542
jun701640
jul761839

Changed since the previous audit

New and lost mentions make progress measurable.

Improved

  • AI Visibility Score increased by 6 points.
  • Two prompts now mention the brand for the first time.
  • Two prompt positions improved.

Needs attention

  • One Gemini mention was lost.
  • Northstar Competitor gained 2 percentage points of share of voice.

Methodology and interpretation

Transparent scope prevents a controlled API sample from being read as a consumer interface or complete market index.

Roby Monitor AEO-v4 measures a controlled API sample with separate metric populations for mention rate, Competitive Share of Voice, organic visibility, structured content coverage, competitive fit and verified business data.

Measured at
Jul 10, 2026, 12:00 PM
Locale / geo
en-US · United States
Sample
28 provider answers
Grounding
MODEL_ONLY, WEB_SEARCH
ChatGPT · gpt-4.1-mini · 7 samples · WEB_SEARCH
Claude · claude-3-7-sonnet · 7 samples · MODEL_ONLY
Gemini · gemini-2.0-flash · 7 samples · WEB_SEARCH
Perplexity · sonar · 7 samples · WEB_SEARCH

organicVisibility

20

entityShortlists

20

contentIntelligence

4

competitiveFit

4

brandAccuracy

4

groundedCitations

21

Mention rateCompetitive Share of VoiceOrganic visibilityStructured Content CoverageCompetitive FitVerified business dataStabilityConfidenceCitationsSource categories
  • - AI answers can vary by time, account, region and model version.
  • - This audit is a reproducible sample, not a guarantee of every future AI response.
  • - The controlled provider API sample is not equivalent to a consumer chat interface or a complete market-wide prompt index.
  • - Durable growth is best evaluated across multiple audits using the same methodology.

Ready for your own measurement results?

Start with your website and receive a report based on your industry, market and competitors.